SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
MEHMOODA SHEIKH – Appellant
Versus
DISTINCT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ritesh Khare With Sadhana Pathak, Advocates, for the Appellant; None for the Respondent, for the Respondent

ORDER

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member - This order shall decide all the cases detailed above. Two complainants, belonging to one family, separately, filed complaints against the same Promoter/Builder - OPs, as mentioned above. It is not out of place to mention here that the entire family lives in one House, i.e., HIG, 5 - Shivaji Nagar, Bhopal. They are accustomed to live in one house, from the time immemorial.

2. It was argued that Smt. Mehmooda Sheikh has got five sons and two daughters. Out of five sons, three are residents of foreign countries. There is no inkling in the evidence on record that they have any intention to return to their country.

3. M/s. Distinct Infrastructure Ltd., OP1, transacts the business of selling plots to public, after developing the residential colonies. Sh. Ramkant Vijayvargiya, OP2, is the Managing Director of the Company, OP1. The complainants executed the following agreements dated 22.02.2009 with the local office of the company, Dil Platinum Plaza, 4 Floor, Mata Mandir, Panchwati Phase-I, Bhopal, for taking a completely developed plot in Panchwati Enclave, Phase-3, Village-Laukheri, Airport Road, Bhopal, as follows :

RP 2962/2015

Complainant OP Agreem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top