SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PREM NARAIN
SATYANARAYAN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
In person, for the Petitioner; None, for the Respondents

ORDER

Prem Narain, Presiding Member. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner, Satyanarayan Pandey, against the order dated 23.9.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh, (in short The State Commission') passed in First Appeal No. 14/803.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant is resident of Bhilai having business of textile/cloth. His son was studying at Mumbai. The complainant had gone to Mumbai and he tried to take out Rs. 10,000 from the ATM of opposite party No. 2/Axis bank at 10.50 a.m. using his ATM card of the State Bank of India/opposite party No. 1. However, no money came out of the machine and the complainant again tried second time to withdraw the money, but this time also he was not successful. The complainant then came back to Bhilai on 24.9.2012. On 16.10.2012, he got his passbook updated from the State Bank of India and he came to know that his account has been debited for Rs. 20,000 on 22.9.2012. The complainant then made complaint to concerned Branch a Manager of the State Bank of India and was promised that inquiry will be made. He made complaint in writing on 18.12.2012 to the Branch Manager of Axis Bank.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top