NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Mr. V.K. Jain, Presiding Member
PRADEEP B. PAWAR - Appellant
Versus
DILIP VARYAMAL VIRMANI KAMAL NAGAR - Respondent
Revision Petition No. 1376 of 2015, (Against the Order dated 18.2.2015 in Appeal No. 220 of 2014 of the State Commission Maharashtra)
Decided on : 29-05-2017
Completion Certificate - Competency of Gram Panchayat - The court considered whether the Gram Panchayat was competent to issue the Completion Certificate and concluded that it was not valid as it was issued without consulting the District Town Planner. The court directed the respondents to obtain concurrence of the District Town Planner and issue a fresh Completion Certificate or confirm the previously issued certificate.
Fact of the Case:
The respondents were required to obtain the requisite Occupancy Certificate and execute the conveyance deed in favor of the Society. The Completion Certificate obtained from the Gram Panchayat was questioned for its competency.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Completion Certificate issued without consulting the District Town Planner was not valid. The court directed the respondents to obtain concurrence of the District Town Planner and issue a fresh Completion Certificate or confirm the previously issued certificate.
Issues: Competency of Gram Panchayat to issue Completion Certificate without consulting the District Town Planner.
Ratio Decidendi: The Completion Certificate issued without consulting the District Town Planner was not considered valid in the eyes of the law.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondents to obtain concurrence of the District Town Planner and issue a fresh Completion Certificate or confirm the previously issued certificate.
ORDER
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member (Oral)—In terms of the directions given by the District Forum in the consumer complaint filed by the petitioner, the respondents were required interalia to obtain the requisite Occupancy Certificate and execute the conveyance deed in favour of the Society. It transpired during the course of hearing that the respondents had obtained the Completion Certificate No.168/03 dated 19.9.2003 from Group Grampanchayat, Cherpoli Bamne. The question which arises for consideration in this petition is as to whether the aforesaid Gram Panchayat was competent to issue the requisite Completion Certificate or not, on the date it was issued. When this petition was heard, on 28.4.2016, a notice was issued to the Collector of District Thane to inform this Commission as to whether Grampanchayat Cherpoli, Taluka Shahpur, District Thane was competent to approve plan on 3.10.2001 and Group Grampanchyat Cherpoli Bamne was competent to issue the Completion Certificate on 19.9.2003 in respect of the project in question. Mr. N.B. Nagargoje, Assistant Director appeared before this Commission on behalf of Collector Thane on 4.1.2017 and filed an affidavit in response to the directions given by this Commission. He also stated before this Commission that though Group Grampanchyat Cherpoli Bamne was competent to issue Completion Certificate on 19.3.2003 it should have consulted the District Town Planner before issuing the Occupancy Certificate. He further stated that they are writing to the State Govt. to regularise the aforesaid irregularity. The affidavit of Mr. N.B. Nagargoje to the extent it is relevant, reads as under:-
"5. I say that according to section 42 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, no person can change the use of agriculture land to non-agriculture without permission to Hon'ble District Collector. I say that it is necessary for village Panchayat to take permission of Hon'ble District Collector before converting any agriculture land to non-agriculture purpose. Hence Village Panchayat has to refer the matter to Hon'ble District Collector for converting agriculture land to non-agriculture purpose. Hereto annexed and marked as an Exhibit "C" is a copy of Section 42 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
6. I say that the Hon'ble District Collector while granting non-agriculture call for the reports/opinion of District Town Planner. There after the District Town Planner after scrutinizing the case according to the B&C class of rural areas, recommend the proposal to the Hon'ble of District. Therefore before granting non-agriculture permission, NOC of Gram Panchayat being local authority is also taken. Hence I say that power to grant development permission outside Gaonthan limit remains with Hon'ble District Collector.
But after grant of N.A. order occupancy certificate mentioned in Rule No.12 of development control regulation of B and C class "Every persons erecting building shall within one month after completion of such Building, shall give written notice to the authority through qualified Architect/Engineer Supervisor regarding completion of work" and occupancy certificate is issued under Rule No.13 of said rule. Hereto annexed and marked as an Exhibit "D" is a copy of rules of development control regulation of B and C class.
Since in village Panchayat area after Grant of N.A. Permission, power to grant occupancy certificate will remain with panchayat. But since permission has been granted with prior concurrence of District Town Planner according to B and C class rule opinion of District Town Planner before granting occupancy certificate under rule No.13 has not been taken. And the same has not been seen to be taken in this present case."
2. It is thus evident that as per the concerned Collector, Group Gram Panchayat Cherpoli ought to have taken the concurrence of District Town Planner before granting the Completion Certificate, which has not been done in this case. There is no evidence of the aforesaid irreg
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.