SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.VYAS, VEENA MISRA, V.K.PATIL
BASTARIA – Appellant
Versus
DOLLY GHOSHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Vibhas Tiwari, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Siddharth Tondon, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

S.C. Vyas, President (Oral)- This appeal is directed against order dated 25.11.2010 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (hereinafter called "District Forum" for short) in Complaint Case No. 236/2010, whereby the appellant herein, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 21,000, along with interest @ 6% p.a. w.e.f. 1.5.2010 to the complainant/respondent and also to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs. 1,000 as cost of litigation, on account of supply of defective furniture to the respondent/complainant at the place of new and demanded furniture.

2. It is not in dispute that respondent/complainant paid a sum of Rs. 5,000 to the appellant/OP and booked in advance one Diwan, one Almirah, one side box and one central table on 25.9.2009. Remaining amount was paid to make the total cost of the furniture Rs. 21,000 and the furniture was purchased by the complainant.

3. The allegation of the complainant is that the furniture, which was sent to the complainant/respondent by the appellant was of inferior quality. The fitting was also not appropriate. The Diwan could not be opened. Almirah was also old one having some scratches. Looking to these def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top