SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.C.VYAS, VEENA MISRA
PRINCIPAL, ST. THOMAS COLLEGE – Appellant
Versus
KU. PALOMI BENERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Satyawan Agrawal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Nand Kumar Sahu, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Veena Misra, Member - This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been preferred against order dated 8.10.2010 passed in Complaint Case No. 239/2010 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (hereinafter called "District Forum" for short), whereby the complaint was allowed and the OP No. 1 was directed to refund proportionate fee to the complainant together with interest @ 6% p.a., Rs. 1,000 for mental harassment and Rs. 1,000 towards cost of litigation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant had taken admission in the educational institute of OP No. 1 in B.Sc. Biotechnology, 1st year and had deposited Rs. 12,220 on 16.6.2008. She attended classes at OP No. 1 institute from 1.7.2008 to 31.8.2008. By that time, she received intimation that she has got admission in Genetic Science, at Oxford College of Science, Bangalore. Hence, she repeatedly requested OP No. 1 to give Transfer Certificate and Migration Certificate, but despite such requests, the certificates were not provided till the complainant deposited remaining amount towards entire fees for the whole year. In this way, complainant's father had to deposit additional amo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top