ORDER

S.C. Vyas, President - This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.11.2010 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (hereinafter called "District Forum" for short) in Complaint Case No. 246/2009, whereby the complaint of the appellant herein, has been dismissed, which was filed for seeking compensation, on account of not providing coaching, as per guarantee provided by the respondent/Coaching Institution.

2. It is not in dispute that respondent is running a coaching institution, in which the appellant herein, took admission in the month of July, 2008. As per terms agreed between the parties, fees of Rs. 14,000 was paid by the complainant for coaching, on the condition that out of that fees, Rs. 8,000 would be refundable in case the student, does not get 80% marks in the 10th Board Examination.

3. The case of the complainant before the District Forum, was that on the assurance of respondent/Coaching Institute, she took admission in the Coaching Institute and paid fees of Rs. 14,000, but after taking admission there, it was observed that teachers of proper skill and caliber, were not appointed by the Coaching Institution and for most of the time, teacher