SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.S.SHARMA, HEENA THAKKAR
MANISH GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.S. Sharma, President - The complainant filed this consumer complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the O.P. seeking direction to the O.P. to pay insured amount Rs. 92,25,000, interest Rs. 4,60,750, Rs. 1,18,000 paid as rent, compensation for mental agony Rs. 1,00,000, cost of litigation Rs. 5,000 and Advocate fees Rs. 20,000, total Rs. 99,18,750.

2. Brief facts of the complaint are that : the complainant is proprietor of firm K. G. Digital Plate situated at Lakhe Nagar, Raipur and he installed a pre-press unit at Lakhe Nagar, Raipur in the month of November, 2009. In the Pre-Press Unit, articles i.e. Plate Exposing Machine, Processor, 4 P.C., Scanner, 2 U.P.S., 30 batteries, etc. were kept. The complainant purchased the above goods from Germany and Denmark. The machine which is used for directly exposing to conventional plate from the computer is only manufactured by Punch Graphics Company of the Germany. The complainant and Smt. Anita Gupta are partners of the firm Jai Badri Vishal Graphics. The O.P. is a Government of India Undertaking Company and is General Insurance Company and is providing insurance services. The complainant ob

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top