SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.APPA RAO, M.SHREESHA
SHRIRAM INVESTMENTS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
B. NAGARAJU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K. Maheswara Rao, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. M. Haribabu, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

D. Appa Rao, President - This is an appeal preferred by opposite party Nos. 1, 2 Shriram Investments Ltd., against the order of the District Forum directing it pay Rs. 40,000 together with costs of Rs. 2,000.

2. The case of the complainant in brief is that he is an employee in Singareni Colonies Ltd., and resident of Godavari Khani. The opposite party held camps at Karimnagar for expanding its business viz., financial services. The branch office at Khammam agreed to advance money for purchase of a tipper under hire purchase agreement, and accordingly advanced an amount of Rs. 7, 50,000 on 8.6.2005 where under he was liable to repay the amount in 36 EMIs. Accordingly he paid Rs. 2, 65,603 towards 14 instalments to the agent when he came for collection. Since he was busy with his office duties he intended to sell it away and repaid the entire loan. When he approached Op2 it had agreed to issue No Objection Certificate . While cancelling the agreement it demanded Rs. 98,787 towards loan amount and Rs. 11,057 towards interest. Accordingly he paid the said amount. In fact it had collected an excess amount of Rs. 79,087. There upon he gave legal notice seeking for refund of amount. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top