SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, RUMNITA MITTAL
SHIV PRAKASH SHAROHA – Appellant
Versus
VIDYA SAGAR INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEURO SCIENCES (VIMHANS) – Respondent


ORDER

J.D. Kapoor, President (Oral)- Complaint of the appellant seeking compensation of Rs. 2,20,000 on account of having been wrongly diagnosed by the respondent was dismissed vide impugned order dated 5.6.2007 by holding that the treatment given by the respondent was correct and there was no negligence nor was the diagnosis wrong.

2. Feeling aggrieved the appellant has preferred this appeal.

3. The case of the appellant in brief was that on 10.9.2002, he felt uneasiness with pain in chest. He consulted doctors of respondent. The appellant reached at 2.15 p.m. at emergency ward of respondent. The duty doctor examined the appellant and checked his blood pressure. The duty doctor did not find anything alarming. He also informed the appellant that chest pain may be due to hypertension. He advised the appellant to visit OPD for further investigation.

4. While the appellant was going towards the OPD wing of respondent, he again felt chest pain and immediately reported chest pain to Dr. Ajay Sinha who was present in the OPD. ECG was conducted, the appellant felt lot of pain. The duty doctor of OP wards gave SOS sorbitrate tablet. The concerned doctor advised rest. Later on the appellant wen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top