SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RUMNITA MITTAL
SADGURU LAND FINANCE – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH GARG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

Ms. Rumnita Mittal, Presiding Member - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act against the order of the District Forum dated 8th January, 2008 whereby the appellant was held guilty of deficiency of service in demanding the maintenance charges and was directed to execute the sale deed of Plot No. E-20, Ved Vihar, Loni, U.P. without demanding any amount either on account of maintenance charges or registration charges as the complainant had already paid the sum of Rs. 40,800 to the OP.

2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the Appellant has preferred the instant appeal.

3. The facts which led to the passing of the impugned order are that the Respondent, Mrs. Santosh Garg was the allottee of plot No. E-20, Ved Vihar, Loni, UP in a project launched by the OP and had agreed to pay Rs. 1,20,000 being the cost of the plot. The last instalment of Rs. 8,600 was paid on 30.6.1993 vide receipt No. 1845. However, the Appellant did not inform the complainant about the status of the project till 22.9.2006, when the Respondent was asked to pay a sum of Rs. 30,800 for execution of the sale deed. Vide said letter the Appellant also called upon the Respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top