SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, RUMNITA MITTAL
KINETIC ENGINEERING (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH KUMAR PRASAD – Respondent


ORDER

J.D. Kapoor, President (Oral)- On account of having sold highly defective motorcycle and also having represented as to the average of 92 kms whereas it hardly gave average of 55 kms, the appellant has been vide impugned order dated 5.8.2005, directed to replace the motorcycle and to pay Rs. 5,000 as compensation towards harassment and Rs. 2,000 as cost of litigation.

2. Feeling aggrieved the appellant has preferred this appeal.

3. Allegations of the respondent leading to the impugned order in brief were that he purchased a Kinetic Motor Cycle model Velocity bearing registration No. DL 3S AH 4928 from appellant No. 2 for Rs. 40,792 on 24.10.2003. He was assured that the motorcycle will give an average of 92 kms for 1 Ltr. Petrol and that it has excellent pick up. In case of any manufacturing problem the vehicle would be replaced by the appellant No. 1. After about one month of its purchase, respondent found that vehicle was heating up even on driving for a few minutes and its pick up was also very low. Even load capacity of the vehicle was low. The clutch plate of the vehicle burnt in January 2004 just after running 5000 kms. When he visited the appellant, clutch plate was chang

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top