SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI, KANWAL INDER
NANITA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
GO AIRLINES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Barkat Ali Zaidi, President (Oral)- The short facts of the case are that the complainant had a ticket for travelling by Airways Go Airlines on 30.1.2007 and the departure time of the aircraft at Mumbai was at 2.15 p.m. reaching Delhi at around 5.50 p.m. The complainant reached the airport, and when she was getting her baggage check-in, she was informed by the air persons that the flight was delayed. Thereafter the air people informed the complainant that the flight will take off at 5.30 p.m. Thereafter, the complainant was informed that the flight was further delayed by one hour. The plane ultimately arrived at 6.50 p.m. and she reached Delhi at about 11.15 p.m. as against the schedule time on 5.50 p.m. Her grouse is that she and other co-passengers were exhausted, and most of them went back to their houses. She had to wait at the lounge during the stay period and there was no arrangement for drinking water, refreshment or food. A representation to this effect was also submitted by the passengers including the complainant to the airport authorities the same day, at Mumbai itself. The complainant, alleging the aforementioned facts, charged the OP with deficiency in service, and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top