SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VEENA BIRBAL, O.P.GUPTA, SALMA NOOR
VIDYA BHUSHAN JAIN OF SCIENCE & RESEARCH CENTRE FOR HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION – Appellant
Versus
SITARAM BHARTIA INSTITUTE – Respondent


ORDER

Veena Birbal, President—This is a complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, 'the Act').

2. The complaint is an engineer qualified from Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi and at the relevant time was engaged in the business of consultancy and trading of minerals. The aforesaid complaint is filed by him against Sitaram Bhartiya Institute of Science i.e. OP-1 which provides medical services to the public, Dr. D.K. Bhargava i.e. OP-2 a Sr. Consultant in the field of Gastroenterology with OP-1 & Appollo Hospital i.e. OP-3. Dr. Bhabha Nanda Das is OP-4. There are no allegations of medical negligence against OP No. 3 and OP No. 4. As per the complaint Dr. Bhabha Nanda Das i.e. OP-4 has saved the life of complainant. It is stated that OP-3 i.e. Appollo Hospital and OP-4 are impleaded only so that complete picture is brought before this Commission to bring out the allegations of medical negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the institute i.e. OP-1 and Dr. D.K. Bhargava i.e. OP-2.

3. Before dealing with the facts of the case, it may be ment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top