SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

U.V.BAKRE, VIDHYA R.GURAV
AIRSONIC HOLIDAYS PRIVATE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SHRIRANG NARVEKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Deepak Gaonkar, Learned Counsel, for the Appellant; Mr. Anuj Salkar, Learned Counsel, for the Respondent

ORDER

U.V. Bakre, President—This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31/07/2015 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North Goa (the "Forum", for short) in Consumer Complaint No. 01/2010. The appellant was the Opposite Party (OP, for short) whereas the deceased respondent No. 1 and the respondent No. 2 were the original Complainants, in the said Complaint. The respondents No. 1(a) to 1(f) are the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No. 1. Parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status in the said Complaint.

2. The original Complainants had filed the said Complaint for a direction to the Opposite Party (OP, for short) to provide a free Goa - Dubai tour to them and to pay to them compensation of Rs. 50,000/- and costs. Case of the Complainants, in short, was as follows:-

They had availed of the services of the OP for an overseas package tour to Jordan, Israel, Egypt and Dubai from 16/05/2009 to 28/05/2009 and had paid to the OP a sum of Rs. 1,76,428/- towards the entire tour. The OP had given to them a copy of itinerary of the tour to Jordan, Israel and Egypt which contained the schedule of the tour. The representative of the O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top