ORDER

Dr. Jatin P. Vaidya, Member - These appeals filed by the original opponents were posted for hearing together at the request of the parties because all these appeals are preferred against the order of the learned Ahmedabad City Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Complaint No. 1184/94 dated 22.6.2004.

2. We have heard the learned advocates of the parties, perused the impugned judgment of the learned Ahmedabad City Forum and also taken into consideration the documents available on record, including the written submissions filed in these appeals.

3. The short and brief facts of the cases are that one Anjanaben wife of the original complainant No. 1 Nalinbhai Hiralal Modi, who was young and healthy, underwent family planning operation - the operation described by parties as minor one which does not cause death, but that in fact caused the death. The learned Ahmedabad City Forum after deliberations gave a verdict of opponents liable to pay compensation for medical negligence and deficiency in service. At no point of time during the entire procedure in Court the original opponents have explained fully and satisfactorily as to the fact that how and why the patient died, though the fac