SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.C.KATHURIA, SHAKUNTLA YADAV
MAJ. GEN. V. K. VERMA – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Party in Person, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

R.C. Kathuria, President - Against the order dated 30.11.2006 of dismissal of the complaint passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon, the appellant-complainant has come up in appeal.

2. The facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant and his wife had purchased the ground floor apartment built on plot No. K2/21, DLF Qutab Enclave Complex, Phase-II, now known as DLF City-II, Gurgaon, from Vikram Kumar respondent-opposite party for a consideration of Rs. 8,00,000, as per registered sale-deed registered with the office of Sub-Registrar, Gurgaon bearing sale-deed No. 6530. The complainant had to incur additional expense of stamp duty of Rs. 1,00,000 and Rs. 18,000 as broker's fee. Thus, the complainant in total spent Rs. 9,18,000 for the purchase of the said property. At the time of sale the opposite party has shown to the complainant and his wife the original title deed in presence of broker in order to convince the complainant in respect of his title to the property. In the month of August, 2001 the complainant received summons from Debt Recovery Tribunal-I (DRT-I), New Delhi, in respect of original application No. 183/2001 dated 9.8.2001 fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top