SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.C.KATHURIA, SHAKUNTLA YADAV
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJJI BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Mahender Singh Proxy for Mr. G.S. Hooda, Advocate, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

R.C. Kathuria, President - Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 6.12.2007 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Fatehabad whereby the amount of Rs. 18,825 added as sundry charges in the bill Ex.C-2 as well as mentioned in the notice No. 2530 dated 28.8.2006 for the period 17.3.2007 to 17.4.2007 payable on 17.5.2007 issued to the respondent-complainant has been set aside and direction has been given to the appellant-opposite parties not to recover the said amount from the complainant and also not to disconnect the electric supply from her tubewell. In addition Rs. 500 has been awarded as litigation expenses.

2. Put shortly, the facts of the case are that the complainant has been provided with electric connection for her tubewell, bearing account No. NJP 15384, JM 53/2060 located in Village Jamalpur Shekha, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad. The complainant had applied for installation of transformer at her tubewell under the dedicated scheme to the opposite parties in the year 2001 for which she had deposited Rs. 10,000 with the opposite parties. The opposite parties had calculated the estimated amount of Rs. 54,770 and by giving benefit of Rs. 39,9

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top