R.S.MADAN, REKHA SHARMA, DIWAN SINGH CHAUHAN
HIMGIRI MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
RAM MEHAR SINGH KUNDU – Respondent
ORDER
R.S. Madan, President - All the above mentioned three appeals have arisen out of the order dated 31.3.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ambala in Complaint No. 02 of 2.1.2003 which relates to the defect in the vehicle/car purchased by the complainant Ram Mehar Singh Kundu from the appellant-opposite parties.
2. It is admitted case of the parties that the complainant (respondent in these appeals) had purchased a Tata Indica car DLE(M) F-II bearing registration No. HR-O6H-9990 from the opposite party, No. 3 M/s. Metro Motors, Ambala Cantt vide invoice No. PCD021724 dated 7.1.2002, the warranty of which was for three years. According to complainant the front rims of the above said car got defected and developed bent due to which both front wheel tyres and engine of the said car had been damaged. The alignment and balancing of the car remained unbalanced and the complainant had to pay regularly for this problem. The complainant approached to the opposite party No. 5 Himgiri Motors, Panipat on 17.1.2002 who charged Rs. 1,354 as service charges of the vehicle but refused to replace the damaged front rims and tyres of the car. Thereafter, not satisfied wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.