SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.S.MADAN, REKHA SHARMA, DIWAN SINGH CHAUHAN
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER MALIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.P. Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

R.S. Madan, President - This appeal is preferred against the order dated 10.11.2001 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressaf Forum, Panipat whereby the complaint filed by the respondent-complainant was accepted and following relief was granted:

" . . . . . . . . we accept the present complaint and direct the respondents to allot Plot No. 1488-P, Sector 24, HUDA, measuring 299 sq. meters, Panipat and if the said plot has been allotted to some other person then the OPs shall allot some alternative plot to the petitioner of the same size in the same sector or in some other developed sector and petitioner shall be liable to pay remaining cost of the plot with interest and penalty as per the rules of the HUDA. The respondents shall make the compliance of this order within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order."

2. The respondent-complainant was allotted a residential plot bearing No. l488-P in Sector 24, Urban Estate, Panipat vide allotment letter No. 4591 dated 24.7.2000. However, before the date of offer of possession the complainant surrendered the plot due to some financial constraints. HUDA authorities accepted the request of the complainant and refund

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top