NAWAB SINGH, B.M.BEDI, URVASHI AGNIHOTRI
VINITA GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
UNITECH LIMITED – Respondent
ORDER
Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President (Oral)- This complaint has been filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") before this Commission.
2. It is the case of the complainants that they booked a flat bearing No. 203-B, measuring 875 sq. ft., with the opposite parties in the project known by the name The Arcadia , at South City, Gurgaon. The sale consideration of Rs. 17,93,750 was paid.
3. It is further the case of the complainants that as per the agreement dated May 16th, 2007 (Annexure C-2), the possession of the flat was to be delivered within 30 months of the execution of agreement subject to the payment of the entire amount due and payable by the purchasers to the vendors. The opposite parties later on increased the super area from 875 sq. ft. to 895 sq. ft and offered the possession of the flat on April 14th, 2011, that is, after more than 52 months of the booking. The opposite parties further demanded (i) a sum of Rs. 2,50,000 on account of car parking charges and service tax thereon; (ii) Rs. 5,000 on account of misc. charges and; (iii) Rs. 65 per sq. ft instead of Rs. 50 per sq. ft on account of interest free security charges. In spite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.