SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.B JOSHI, S.K.KAKADE
SATYASHEEL AVINASH AKOLE – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY MADHUKAR KORANNE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A.K. Tiwari, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Hemant Bhangale, Advocate, for the Respondent Nos. 199/217

ORDER

P. B Joshi, Presiding Judicial Member

1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by District Consumer Forum, Jalgaon in proceeding under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act bearing E. A. Nos. 165/17,131/ 17,156/17,157/15,106/17 on the applications moved by accused challenging jurisdiction, limitation and procedure of the said proceedings and thereby rejecting the applications these revisions have been preferred by original respondent-accused.

2. Facts necessary for deciding these revisions are as under:

Original complainant-present respondents filed consumer complaints against the revision petitioners before District Consumer Forum, Jalgaon. Those complaints were partly allowed. However, those orders were not complied by the opposite parties in those matters. That is why proceedings under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act were initiated by the original complainants. Revision petitioners appeared in those proceedings as accused. During the pendency of the proceedings, the accused in some of the proceedings moved applications challenging jurisdiction, limitation and procedure in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top