SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.B.JOSHI, NARENDRA KAWDE
MAUREEN PEREIRA – Appellant
Versus
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE HDIL – Respondent


ORDER

Narendra Kawde Member. - By this common order, both these consumer complaints shall be decided as both the complaints are involved identical facts and law and opponent is the same.

2. Complainants in complaint no.CC/14/94 and CC/14/95 are wife and husband respectively. Registered agreements dated 12/11/2010 were executed separately between the complainants and opponent builder/developer for purchase of flat no.303 and flat no.304, 3rd floor, 'D' Wing in the building known as 'Premier Residences', situated on S.R.A.Plot No.17, Sub-urban Scheme No.1, Village Kurla-II, Tal.Kurla, Dist.Mumbai for consideration of Rs.35,18,170/- and Rs.50,67,215/- respectively. Said flats having carpet area of 42.32 sq.mtr. and 60.96 sq.mtr. respectively were to be delivered before 30/12/2011. Entire consideration has been paid in each consumer complaint as per the agreement and even amount of VAT, service tax, maintenance deposit including interest has been paid for each flat in each complaint. As per the stipulation in the agreement, last instalment was to be paid while taking possession of the flat. However, construction was delayed and therefore ready possession for delivery of the flat was ava

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top