SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

USHA S.THAKARE, NARENDRA KAWDE
RAMKRISHNA RISHIKUMAR SINHA – Appellant
Versus
VAIDEHI AKASH HOUSING PVT. LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Narendra Kawde, Member - Opponent no.1 is a builder/developer company and opponent no.2, 3 and 4 are the directors thereof. Opponent no.5 is deleted by the order dated 31/01/2013 of this Commission as no relief was pressed. Opponent no.6 is alleged to have stepped in the shoes of opponent no.1 to 4 since development agreement entered into by the opponent no.5-Co-operative Housing Society with opponent no.1 to 4 has been terminated. Opponent no.1 to 4 executed registered agreement on 20/03/2009 with the complainant for sale of flat no.201 admeasuring 540 sq.ft. on the second floor of the building known as Building No.4 to be constructed by opponent no.1 to 4 for total consideration of Rs. 40 lacs. Amount of Rs. 10 lacs as a down payment [part consideration] has been paid by the complainant and duly acknowledged at the time of executing the agreement. Balance consideration was to be paid as per the stipulations in the para 5 of the registered agreement. Possession of the flat was to be delivered by the end of month of Dec.2010. Complainant, as pleaded, has paid total amount of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top