SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.N.AGGARWAL, JASBIR KAPOOR, DARSHAN SINGH
GAGANDEEP SAREEN – Appellant
Versus
IMPROVEMENT TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Harish Goyal and Mr. Naresh Kaushal, Advocates, for the Appellant; Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

S.N. Aggarwal, President - Jagatpal Sareen had purchased built-up House No. 60-C situated in Ranjit Avenue, Ropar from the respondents in the draw of lots held on 25.2.2000 for an amount of Rs. 6,38,000. He had made the payment of Rs. 58,000 at the spot and the remaining amount was paid in instalments. Said Jagatpal Sareen expired on 9.9.2002 leaving behind Gagandeep Sareen and Bharatdeep Sareen - appellants as his only legal heirs. The wife of Jagatpal Sareen had pre-deceased him. After the death of Jagatpal Sareen, the last instalment of Rs. 60,464 was deposited by the appellants. The appellants requested the respondents to transfer House No. 60-C situated in Ranjit Avenue, Ropar in their name as legal heirs of Jagatpal Sareen.

2. It was further pleaded that the respondents vide their letter dated 2.9.2003 demanded an amount of Rs. 31,900 from the appellants as transfer fee. The appellants requested respondents not to recover this amount as they are claiming the transfer of the house in their name as the legal heirs of their father Jagatpal Sareen. The appellants received another letter dated 22.12.2003 in which the demand of Rs. 31,900 was repeated. The respondent also claim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top