SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.N.AGGARWAL, AMARPREET SHARMA
IMPROVEMENT TRUST – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Birinder Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R.S. Joshi, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

S.N. Aggarwal, President - The version of the respondent was that he was allotted plot No. 7 by the appellants vide allotment letter dated 26.6.2001. The respondent deposited the instalments and the plot price stands paid.

2. It was further pleaded that the appellants had failed to provide the basic amenities like water supply, sewerage, roads, electricity, etc. nor they had provided the petrol pump, park, market, etc. as assured by them. The appellants had also failed to deliver possession of the plot at the spot to the respondent by making demarcation. Hence, the complaint for direction to the appellants to provide the basic amenities and also to deliver vacant possession. Interest was also claimed on the principal amount deposited by the respondent and for refund of the interest amount paid on the instalments. Compensation, interest and costs were also prayed.

3. The appellants filed the written reply. It was admitted that the respondent was allotted plot No. 7 by the appellants measuring 161.33 square yards in 7 acres Maharaja Ranjit Singh Market vide allotment letter dated 26.6.2001. It was pleaded that the 4th and 5th instalments were payable in June 2003 and December 2003

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top