SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.S.KLAR, HARCHARAN SINGH GURAM
GIANPAL ANAND – Appellant
Versus
DR. MOHD YAMIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Munish Goel, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

J. S. Klar, Presiding Judicial Member - The appellant of this appeal (the complainant in the complaint) has directed this appeal against the respondents of this appeal (the First Appeal No.261 of 2011 2 opposite parties in the complaint), challenging order dated 05.01.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ludhiana, dismissing the complaint of the complainant. The instant appeal has been preferred against the same by the complainant now appellant in this appeal.

2. The complainant Gianpal Anand has filed the complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, "the Act") against the OPs on the averments that his left leg was fractured on 10.4.2008, when he suddenly fell from the bed. He was undergoing unbearable pain in his lower left limb and could not put on any weight on it. He was taken to the OPs and admitted in DMC Ludhiana, vide admission no.2008-12064 CR No.2008-34414 under Dr. Mohd Yamin of Orthopedic Department. OP No.2 advised operation and diagnosed closed fracture subtrochantric region femur left side. OP conducted open reduction and internal fixation of fracture with Recon (zimmer) (12x38) (2 cervical screws) (2D) on 11.4.2008. OP assured

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top