SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GURDEV SINGH, BALDEV SINGH SEKHON, SURINDER PAL KAUR
ESTATE OFFICER, GARDEN HEIGHTS – Appellant
Versus
PARVEEN SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R. Bansal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Braham Sharma, Representative, for the Respondent

ORDER

Gurdev Singh President Member. - This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/opposite party No.3 against the order dated 6.3.2014 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala (in short, "District Forum"), vide which the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant, Dr. (Mrs.) Parveen Sharma, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, "the Act") was allowed and the opposite parties were directed to allow her to make use of the stilt area, as she had been doing earlier, for the sake of parking her car and to pay Rs. 25,000/-, as compensation on account of harassment and mental agony experienced by her, which was to include costs also.

2. The complainant alleged, in her complaint, that she applied for purchase of a residential flat from the opposite parties on 1.1.2007 with a covered area of 1740 square feet and paid Rs. 2,52,500/-, vide cheque dated 15.1.2007 towards booking charges. As per the terms and conditions of the Agreement, flat was to be well furnished and facilities like lift, club, swimming pool and car parking were to be provided. The possession letter was issued to her on 3.6.2011 as per the terms and conditions of that A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top