SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.K.TYAGI, VEENA SHARMA
SH. MOHAN SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
TATA MOTORS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sh. V.K. Srivastava, Learned Counsel, for the Appellant; Sh. S.K. Gupta, Learned Counsel, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Veena Sharma, Member - This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, has been preferred by the appellant-complainant against the order dated 07.05.2008 passed by the District Forum, Nainital in consumer complaint No. 117 of 2006, whereby the District Forum has dismissed the consumer complaint.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint are that the complainant Sh. Mohan Singh Bisht has purchased LPT Model truck of Tata Company on 28.11.2005 from the showroom of the opposite party No. 2-M/s Commercial Motors, Haldwani, Nainital, bearing registration No. UA04-C-6337, Engine No. 697 T.C.55 KUJ 132618, Chassis No. 373344KUZ 132618, which was hypothecated from ICICI Bank. The said vehicle was driven/plied according the instructions and the services of the vehicle were done timely, even then the vehicle was suffering from many major defects. On 18.06.2006, the pump of the aforesaid truck became defected and due to this defect the truck was unable to run. The opposite party No. 2 has brought the vehicle to the workshop & rectified the problem. The problem was not fully rectified, so the complainant was facing difficulties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top