SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BHANWAR SINGH, RAGHUNATH PRASAD
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
RANVIJAY SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

Raghunath Prasad, Member - These two appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 7.8.2004 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Rai Bareilly in Complaint Case No. 208/2000 directing both the appellants, jointly and severally, either to pay a sum of Rs. 3,81,000 to the complainant or to supply a vehicle of the same value. Since the issues involved are similar and both the appeals arise out of a common complaint and against a common judgment and, otherwise too, both the appeals can be decided together, it is deemed appropriate to decide both the appeals together by an instant common judgment. The original judgment shall form part of the record of leading Appeal No. 1934/SC/2004 and its certified copy shall be placed on the record of Appeal No. 2250/SC/2004.

2. Heard Mr. Kashi Nath Shukla, learned Counsel for the Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, Mr. A K Mishra, learned Counsel for the Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited and Mrs. Nalini Jain duly supported by Mr. Anurag Srivastava, learned Counsel for the complainant and perused the record.

3. Mr. Shukla argued that Mahindra and Mahindra Limited has no concern whatsoever with Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top