SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BHANWAR SINGH, RACHNA
RAM PAL – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM LAL CHAURASIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.K. Shukla, Advocate, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

Bhanwar Singh, President (Oral ) - Heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and perused the impugned order dated 19.2.2009. By virtue of this order, the Complaint Case No. 144/2008, Sri Shyam Lal Chaurasia v. Sri Ram Pal, appears to have been listed for final hearing on 16.3.2009. Although the revisionist/opposite party had moved an application for time to file written statement, yet no order was passed on the said application and the case was straightaway listed for final hearing. Apart, that the impugned order is absolutely non-reasoned, it is against the tenets of justice as it has deprived the revisionist of his valuable right to file written statement. The revisionist cannot be restrained in this short slip manner from pleading his cause by way of brining his written statement on record. Therefore, we are of the view that the impugned order suffer from serious legal infirmity and material irregularity. If allowed to stand it will be result in miscarriage of justice. It was certainly not within the jurisdiction of the Forum below to refuse to grant time to the revisionist to file his written statement unless of course there would have been a valid reason to do so. As ment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top