TANVEER SULTANA VS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIRENDRA SINGH, JITENDRA NATH SINHA, SANJAI KUMAR
TANVEER SULTANA – Appellant
Versus
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
V.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant; B.P. Dubey, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Virendra Singh, President. - This complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by Smt. Tanveer Sultana against the New India Assurance Company Limited with the following prayers: That the opposite party is liable to pay the following compensation to the complainant after deducting a sum of Rs. 2,50,000, received by the complainant under protest:

Insured amount	Rs. 5,00,000
Interest for the period from 19.12.1999 to 19.2.2002	Rs. 1,95,000
Compensation on account of deficient services and loss of business @ Rs. 10,000 per month.	Rs. 2,60,000.
For cost of litigation and related expenses.	Rs. 15,000
Total	Rs. 9,70,000

Future and pendente lite interest . 18% till the date of actual payment.

2. The facts of the complaint case stated in brief are that the complainant had purchased a Tata Telco Ten Wheeled Truck Model LPT-2213/56 on 01-06-1995 from Kailash Motors, Kanpur and got constructed the body of the said truck upon the chassis. After construction of the body of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

VIRENDRA SINGH, JITENDRA NATH SINHA, SANJAI KUMARTANVEER SULTANA – AppellantVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

VIRENDRA SINGH, JITENDRA NATH SINHA, SANJAI KUMAR
TANVEER SULTANA – Appellant
Versus
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent