SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SILPI MAJUMDER, SHANKAR COARI
MINTU DAS – Appellant
Versus
WBSEDCL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Subrata Dey, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Srijan Nayak, Mr. S.K. Kundu, Advocates, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Silpi Majumder, Member - This appeal has been directed against the judgment passed by the learned District Forum, Uttar Dinajpur at Raijung, on 2.3.2010 in the case No. 02/2009 wherein the Ld. Forum below was pleased to dismiss the complaint on contest against the OP-1 and OP-2. The Forum has directed the Complainant to pay a cost of Rs. 5,000 to the OP-2 within a period of 30 days from the date of the judgment, failing which the OP-2 would be at liberty to put the decree into execution through the Forum below.

2. Being aggrieved by the abovementioned order the Appellant-Complainant has preferred the present appeal before this Commission contending the same facts as stated by him in the petition of complaint before the Forum below. In the grounds of memorandum of appeal the Appellant has stated that the Trial Forum has failed to appreciate that the Respondent No.1 has suppressed material facts while approaching before the Ld. Forum and this Appellant has never been directed by the Respondent No.1 to supply local items for the execution of service connection to the business premises of the Appellant. It has been further stated by the Appellant that the Forum below has erred

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top