SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHYAMAL GUPTA, UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CESC LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AMIT SEN GUPTA – Respondent


ORDER

Shyamal Gupta, Member

1. Both these Appeals emanate out of the Order dated 18-03-2014 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Kolkata, Unit-II (Central) in CC/146/2013, whereof the complaint has been allowed. Since the bone of contention of these Appeals are same, they are disposed of through this common order.

2. The complaint revolves over alleged installation of faulty meters at the residence of the Complainants. It is alleged that ever since service connection has been provided by the OPs, i.e., on 10-06-1999, the Complainants have always been at the receiving ends, thanks to installation of faulty meters. On the basis of their complaints, although meters have been replaced, there has been no improvement to the situation. The meter was lastly replaced by the OPs on 17-06-2009. Despite such replacement, the meter was over-registering energy consumption and the OPs too admitted such fact. However, they quantified such excessive reading at 4.89%; whereas, according to the Complainants, it should be 19%. Further allegation of the Complainants is that, the OPs by issuing a back-dated letter dated 27-05-2013, changed the interest rate in respect of CRES deposits illegally from 9.50% to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top