SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.GUPTA, S.P.KAPOOR, DEVINDERJIT DHATT
J. K. BABBAR – Appellant
Versus
PICCADILY CINEMA HALL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Party in Person, for the Appellant; Mr. Rajinder Singh, District Attorney., for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Devinderjit Dhatt, Member - This appeal has been filed against order dated 5.5.2008 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh in Complaint Case No. 675 of 2007. The contextual facts in brief are as under.

2. As per averments, the complainant accompanied by his wife went to Piccadily Cinema Hall on 29.7.2007 for (6.00 to 9.00 p.m. show) of movie titled as Partner . The tickets bearing No. 66832 and 66833 against consideration of Rs. 80 for the upper stall were purchased. It is averred that seat Nos. L-14 and L-15 were mentioned on the tickets in question. The complainant is aggrieved against the bad condition of seats allotted to him and has stated that the cloth/cover/rexine material of the seat No. 14 was entirely torn from the upper side and some nails were protruding out due to which his shirt was torn. It is also alleged that similar was the condition of seat No. L-15 and it was uncomfortable, not properly balanced due to which it was an ordeal for them to sit for three hours. It is also alleged that the seat numbers given were of the lower stall, however he was charged for the upper stall. As per case set up by the complainant he request

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top