SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRITAM PAL, S.P.KAPOOR, NEENA SANDHU
TESOL INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.S. Dhiman, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Maj. Gen. S.P. Kapoor, Member - Vide this common order, we are disposing of three appeals bearing Nos. 661, 662 and 663 all of 2009 filed by OP i.e. Tesol India arising out of one and the common order dated 7.10.2009 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as District Forum) in complaint case No. 862 of 2009 : Sanjeev Kumar v. Tesol India, vide which two similar complaint cases bearing No. 864 of 2009 and 913 of 2008 filed by Gaurav Bakshi and Ali Asghar Gakhar were also decided.

2. Briefly the facts as taken from complaint case No. 862 of 2009 are that according to the complainant Sh. Sanjeev Kumar on being attracted by an advertisement in the newspaper which stated "OVERSEAS JOB GUARANTEED" and job would fetch "MONTHLY 1-3 LACS PLUS" and after paying the full fee of Rs. 50,000, took admission in the tesol programme with the OP As per the complainant, after completing the said course, no placement was give to him for a job. It was averred that when the complainant approached OP along with some other students, it flatly refused to help. It was told to the complainant by the OP that it had nothing to do with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top