SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRITAM PAL, S.P.KAPOOR, NEENA SANDHU
BHIM SAIN – Appellant
Versus
SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR HOUSING UNIT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Rajinder Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

ORDER

Pritam Pal, President - This appeal for enhancement of compensation by complainant is directed against the order dated 12.10.2009 whereby his complaint bearing No. 555 of 2009 was allowed by the District Consumer Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh in the following terms :

"The OPs are directed to refund the amount of Rs. 10,004 along with interest @ 8% per annum since the date of deposit i.e. 31.12.2003, till the amount is actually paid to the complainant. They will also pay him Rs. 2,000 towards costs of litigation. If the above amount is not paid within the period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, the OPs would be liable to pay penal interest @ 12% per annum since the date of deposit i.e. 31.12.2003, till its payment."

2. Put shortly the facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant booked one three bedroom Type C house in the proposed Swaran/Rajat Yojna i.e. Sahara City Home Township in Chandigarh and deposited a total sum of Rs. 10,004 vide receipt dated 31.12.2003. The officials of the OPs gave verbal assurance that the possession of the house would be handed over by the end of 2007. However, OPs failed to start the construction, therefore, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top