SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRITAM PAL, S.P.KAPOOR
RAJPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA PRASAD (HANDWRITING EXPERT) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
None., for the Appellant; Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Pritam Pal, President - This revision by complainant Rashpal Singh is directed against the order dated 8.10.2009 passed by District Consumer Forum-I, U.T. Chandigarh whereby his complaint bearing No. 925 of 2009 for refund of Rs. 5,500 paid to Sh. Devendra Prasad as expenses of his being expert witness was dismissed in limine with a penalty of Rs. 10,000 under Section 26 of the Consumer Protection Act.

The parties in this judgment hereinafter shall be referred to as per their ranking before the District Forum.

2. In nutshell the facts culminated to the commencement of this appeal may be recapitulated thus:

The complainant was a tenant in certain premises and his landlord in 1999 filed an ejectment application under the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act in which the complainant was alleged to have been served and on account of his non-appearance he was proceeded against ex parte. The ejectment order was passed against him on 8.6.2001. The complainant then filed a civil suit for declaration in the year 2002 to the effect that he was never served in the ejectment application and the report about service of summons did not bear his signatures which was forgery and fabrication. In orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top