SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRITAM PAL, NEENA SANDHU
SAHARA INDIA PARIWAR – Appellant
Versus
WING COMMANDER AKHIL DEEP SACHDEVA-S – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. N.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Pritam Pal, President - The aforementioned two appeals arise out of one and the same order dated 13.4.2010 passed by the District Consumer Forum-II, U.T. Chandigarh whereby complaint bearing No. 1026 of 2009 filed by Wing Commander Akhil Deep Sachdeva (hereinafter to be referred as complainant) was allowed with costs of Rs. 5000 against Sahara India Pariwar etc. (hereinafter to be referred as OPs) and OPs were directed to pay Rs. 1.35 lacs which the complainant had paid to them as provisional booking amount for housing flat in Sahara City Homes, Chandigarh. A sum of Rs. 80,000 was awarded as compensation for harassment and mental agony on account of huge delay in settling the case of complainant for allotment of promised flat. OPs were jointly and severally directed to pay the said amount within six weeks from the receipt of its certified copy, failing which OPs were held liable to pay penal interest @ 18% p.a. from 31.12.2004 the date of deposit till payment.

2. In fact appeal No. 207/2010 has been filed by Sahara India Pariwar, etc. for setting aside the impugned order whereas appeal No. 211/2010 has been filed by the complainant for enhancement of compensation. Since, in bot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top