SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRITAM PAL, JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL
PANKAJ MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjiv Trikha, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Jagroop Singh Mahal, Member - This is complainant's appeal against order dated 5.2.2009 passed by learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as District Forum) vide which the complaint filed by the complainant was dismissed.

2. According to the complainant, he was approached by Ms. Nishu Garg of OP No. 1 and on her persuasion, took a policy effective from 27.12.2005 with an annual premium of Rs. 1,60,408 under Life Maker Unit Linked Investment Plan. When the policy was received by him, the allocation of funds was not made by the OPs/respondents as per the commitment and discussions held at the time of finalization of the proposal and therefore, the complainant applied for "free look cancellation" of the policy on 6.12.2006. When he did not hear anything from the OPs/respondents, he served a legal notice dated 21.3.2008 to refund the full amount of Rs. 1,60,408 along with interest but was informed by the respondents that he was liable to pay administration charges, etc. the policy cannot be cancelled and the OPs/respondents decided to deduct more than 55% value of the premium, which was fraudulent and unethical act on thei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top