SHAM SUNDER, DEV RAJ
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK – Appellant
Versus
AJIT GOEL – Respondent
ORDER
Sham Sunder, President - This order shall dispose of the aforesaid two First Appeal Nos. 301 of 2013 titled as Standard Chartered Bank v. Ajit Goel and Another, and 331 of 2013 titled Ajit Goel and Another v. Standard Chartered Bank, arising out of the common order dated 7.6.2013, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only), vide which, it allowed Consumer Complaint, bearing No. 327 of 2012, and directed the Opposite Party (now appellant in First Appeal No. 301 of 2013 and respondent in First Appeal No. 331 of 2013) , as under:
"Hence, we are of the opinion that foreclosure charges of 4.41% levied by the Opposite Party on the Complainants at the time of foreclosure have been wrongly levied as they have not been provided in terms of the agreement placed on record by the Opposite Party. Also levy of annual charge of Rs. 1,32,002 is not part of the agreement and hence, to our mind, not leviable by the Opposite Party. This complaint is allowed accordingly. The Opposite Party is directed to refund the total amount of foreclosure charges taken from the Complainants, as well as the amount of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.