SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S.HORA, SIKANDAR PUNJABI
PUSHPA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ramswaroop Jaju, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Vizzy Agarwal, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

G.S. Hora, Presiding Member - This appeal is against the order dated 23rd April, 2003 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Bhilwara whereby the complaint of the complainant was dismissed. The complainant owns a Jeep, which was comprehensively insured for the period from 17.3.1999 to 16.3.2000. The said Jeep met with an accident on 15.9.1999. Claim was filed by the complainant with the Insurance Company claiming Rs. 95,340. Surveyor was appointed by the Insurance Company who assessed the loss at Rs. 38,319. After deducting salvage value the total amount found payable was Rs. 35,190. The claim was repudiated by the company on the ground that at the time of accident, the vehicle had no fitness certificate. The complaint was dismissed on this ground alone. Feeling aggrieved this appeal has been filed.

2. The learned Counsel for the complainant submitted that at the most, it is a case of violation of provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. The Surveyor has nowhere mentioned that non-existence of fitness certificate has contributed to the accident and, therefore, simply on this technical ground, the claim should not have been rejected. The learned Counsel frankly conceded that the claim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top