SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, VIMLA SETHIA
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjeev Arora, Advocate, for the Appellant; In person., for the Respondent

ORDER

Sunil Kumar Garg, President - This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the appellants Insurance Co. which were opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 before the District Forum against order dated 18.12.2008 passed by the District forum, Jaipur Camp, Jaipur in Complaint No. 396-08 by which the complaint of the complainant respondent was allowed in the manner that the appellants were directed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,299 + Rs. 50,476 total Rs. 55,775, the amount incurred by the complainant respondent in the treatment of his son within 45 days failing which the appellants would further pay interest @ 9% p.a. on the above amount from the date of passing of the order and further they were directed to pay a sum of Rs. 3,000 as costs of litigation and Rs. 5,000 as compensation for mental agony.

2. It arises in the following circumstances

That the complainant respondent had filed a complaint against the appellants before the District Forum, Jaipur on 16.6.2008 inter alia stating that the complainant respondent had taken a Mediclaim Policy for himself on 18.10.2002 for one year and thereafter he had got that policy renewed w.e.f. 17.10.2003 and under the ren

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top