ANIL KUMAR MISHRA, SUNITA RANKA
TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR LODHA – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment dated 15.2.2011 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Ajmer ( hereinafter referred to as DCF ) in Complaint Number 04/2011 titled Shri Rajesh Kumar Lodha v. Tata AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd., whereby the complaint of the complainant/respondent (hereinafter referred to as the complainant ) was allowed and the appellants were directed to make a payment of Rs. 5,94,000, the claim amount of the insurance with 9% interest and were also directed to make the payment of Rs. 3,000 as cost of the proceedings.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that Mrs. Manohar Kanwar, the mother of the complainant obtained a policy of Life Insurance Sure Flexi Regular Premium Unit Link Plan for Rs. 5,94,000 on 24.7.2009. The insured died on 14.12.2009 and the insurance claim presented by the complainant was repudiated on the ground that the insured concealed the facts of getting her lumbar punctured before signing the proposal form for the policy. The complainant filed the present complaint before the DCF which was allowed ex parte vide impugned order.
3. An application to set aside the ex parte judgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.