SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.SAMPATH, PON.GUNASEKARAN
TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD – Appellant
Versus
A. VEERAPPAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S. Rajakumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. V. Balaji, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

K. Sampath, President - The opposite parties in O.P. No. 171/2000 on the file of the District Forum, Chennai (North) are the appellants herein.

2. The case of the complainant was as follows: The complainant was the absolute owner of the flat in second floor, 254/11, Pioneer Colony, Anna Nagar, Chennai. He took possession on 31.12.1984. The sale deed was executed on 9.10.1995. Even at the time of taking possession, the roof was defective. The leakage was found during rainy season. The opposite parties did plastering work earlier. During 1996, the opposite parties did some weathering course. In 1999 the roof completely collapsed and the complainant had to vacate the flat. On 16.6.1999 he gave a representation. The Junior Engineer came and prepared estimate. There was no further response from the opposite parties and the complaint came to be filed.

3. The opposite parties took the stand that the claim was hopelessly barred by limitation. Whenever defects were brought to the knowledge of the opposite parties, they had done repair works. The repairs had occurred due to poor maintenance of the flat and there was no deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.

4. Before th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top