ORDER

M. Thanikachalam, President - 1st opposite party is the appellant.

2. The respondent in this appeal, who is the complainant in O.P. No. 319/2003, on the file of District Forum, Coimbatore, had obtained a cell phone connection No. 98422 94497, from the 1st opposite party, for which he was regularly paying the bill, as demanded. The 3rd opposite party is the bankers of 1st and 2nd opposite parties, whereas the 4th opposite party is the bankers of the complainant, at Coimbatore.

3. The complainant, having not received the cell phone bill, for the month of February 2003, contacted the 2nd opposite party, ascertained the amount payable, and issued a cheque, for Rs. 874. Despite the payment, cell phone connection was disconnected by the 1st opposite party on 10.3.2003, abruptly, without assigning any reason, which should be construed as deficiency in service. Enquiry revealed the cheque was dishonoured, as if funds insufficient, in the complainant's account, and on that basis, disconnection should be construed as negligence, which was restored only on 29.3.2003, after the clearance of the cheque on 26.3.2003. By disconnecting, opposite parties 1 and 2 caused deficiency in service, by