ORDER

Thiru J. Jayaram, Presiding Judicial Member - This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Forum, Tirunelveli passed in C.C. No. 29/2013, dated 1.7.2013, dismissing the complaint.

2. The case of the complainant is that he purchased a motorcycle from the 1st opposite party who is the dealer of the 2nd opposite party who is the manufacturer, on 22.12.2012 paying Rs. 68,800/- and the motorcycle developed some problems from the date of purchase and the motorcycle was producing noise from the Fork which was reported, to the 1st opposite party to rectify the defect. In spite of the best efforts by the opposite parties the fork sound could not be controlled and the defect could not be rectified. Therefore the opposite parties admitted the defect and refunded of the cost of the vehicle i.e. Rs. 68,800/- to the complainant taking back the vehicle. This amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties and hence the complaint.

3. According to the opposite parties for the fork racer but the complainant did not allow them to do the job dismantling the fork. However they refunded the cost of the vehicle viz., Rs. 68,800/- to the complainant t