SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.RAGUPATHI, J.JAYARAM
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU – Appellant
Versus
KOTHANDARAMAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. K. Senthil Kumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. T. Natarajan, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Thiru J. Jayaram, Judicial Member - This appeal is filed by the opposite parties against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North] in C.C.302/2002, dated 25.11.2008, allowing the complaint.

2. The case of the complainant is that his son Loganathan was studying in a Higher Secondary School at Villivakkam, Chennai. On 8.12.2000 and 9.12.2000 the students were medically examined by doctors under the Varumun Kaappom scheme of the Government. On examination of his son, the doctors advised him surgery for Tonsillitis and accordingly he was admitted in the 2nd opposite party's hospital i.e. the Government General Hospital, Chennai and the operation was performed between 11.30 a.m. and 3.30 p.m. on 29.1.2001 and his son was normal till 6.30 p.m. At about 7.30 p.m., an injection was administered and at the time of injecting, his son was shouting that it was painful and ignoring his cries, injection was fully administered and instantaneously his son's body turned blue and he swooned and he was shifted to another room and the doctors informed the complainant that he was kept under ventilation and at about 9.30 p.m. he was declared dead.

3. He requested t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top