ORDER

J.P. Vyas, Member - This is an appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 14.9.2006 of the District Forum, Guna passed in C.C. No. 281/2006, whereby the application seeking direction for payment of Rs. 2,80,000 as cost of the stolen vehicle and Rs. 5,000 as damages from the respondent was rejected.

2. The case in brief is that in the intervening night of 13.7.2004 and 14.7.2004, vehicle Mahindra Marshal No. UP-93 G-3079 belonging to the appellant was stolen away about which a formal FIR was lodged in the police station. She informed the respondent Insurance Company about it. The latter sent for the report of the Surveyor and asked the appellant to produce F.R. sanctioned by the competent Court. The appellant sought time to do so, but the respondent allegedly closed the claim case for want of F.R. The appellant then filed a complaint on 1.7.2006 before the District Forum, Guna praying that the respondent be directed to pay Rs. 2,80,000 as cost of the said vehicle and Rs. 5,000 as damages for the mental agony caused. After hearing both the parties and noting that there is no evidence to show that the copy of the FR sanctioned on 1.12.2005