SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUBASH MAHTAB, BASANTI DEVI
LIC OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
ASHALATA PAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M/s. P.R. Barik and Associates, Advocates, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. Basanti Devi, Member - The opposite parties in C.D. Case No. 6 of 2001 have assailed the orders dated 29.10.2001 of the District Forum, Balasore directing them to pay the full benefits available under the Policy No. E-582440762 and Rs. 1,000 as litigation cost to the complainant within a period of sixty days from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, as illegal.

2. Facts in brief are that Surendra Kumar Pal obtained a Money Back Plan with profits policy No. 582440762 dated 28.4.1998 for an endowment sum of Rs. 25,000 from opposite party Nos.l and 2 on quarterly premium of Rupees 413 payable in the months of January, April, July and October. The maturity date of the policy was 28.4.2018. Smt. Ashalata Pal - the wife of the life assured is the nominee. The life assured had only paid quarterly premium upto quarter April and died in a vehicle accident on 18.9.1999. By that time, the quarterly premium for July, 1999 was not paid. Quarterly premium for July, 1999 was paid with late fee to opposite party No. 2 on 20.9.1999 and opposite party No. 2 had granted receipt. Complainant intimated opposite parties in respect to the death of the assured which opposite parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top