ORDER

M. Shreesha, Member

Challenge in this Revision Petition under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”) is to the order dated 04.04.2018 in Appeal No. A/16/54 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short “the State Commission”). By the impugned order the State Commission has partly allowed the Appeal filed by the Complainant observing as follows:

“According to appellant who is original complainant, there is no dispute that on 15/04/2012 physical possession of flat no. 702 was given to the complainant in the said building but without assured amenities and facilities mentioned as above. Appellant also pressed for higher compensation than awarded by the learned forum below. We find that learned forum while passing an award directed opponents to provide facilities at their expenses alike sample flat in the same building ‘Arihant Sparsh’ situated on first floor. The facilities as mentioned above ought to be incorporated in the operative order impugned in this appeal so that builder shall provide facilities acco